Hi Siegfried, Thanks for your clarification.
It's really commonly use to bypass the incubator for small projects to become Apache Commons subproject status? I’m a contributor and not deeply involved to assimilate new projects in ASF. Thats is, why I vote with zero. mit freundlichen Grüßen Uwe Barthel -- bart...@x-reizend.de > On 31 Oct 2015, at 11:01, Siegfried Goeschl <siegfried.goes...@it20one.com> > wrote: > > Hi Uwe, > > for such small components Apache incubator is sort of overkill - setup can be > daunting and Naomi is unlikely to attract a large community. That’s the > reason why small potential ASF projects are looking for an umbrella project > and Apache Commons is designed to be such an umbrella project - AFAIK every > ASF committer has commit rights on sandbox components (anyone out there who > knows that for sure) > > In other words - if Naomi becomes ASF it should be Apache Commons > > Cheers, > > Siegfried Goeschl > > >> On 31 Oct 2015, at 10:28, Uwe Barthel <bart...@x-reizend.de> wrote: >> >> [x] -0 OK, but… >> >> … on going over Incubator instead. >> It gives the chance to grow up a community and re-invite the code and >> documentation. >> >> I’m with Benedikt pointing to the rock-star-thing and people behind the ASF. >> Why not use the Incubator as described by the ASF[1]? >> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#incubator >> >> mit freundlichen Grüßen >> Uwe Barthel >> -- >> bart...@x-reizend.de >> >> >>> On 30 Oct 2015, at 01:42, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for >>> review using the git commands below. All are welcome to vote, votes >>> from PMC members are binding. Assuming a positive vote, we will >>> execute a software grant with the authors and use the code as the >>> basis for a new Commons Sandbox component. >>> >>> This VOTE will close in 72 hours. More discussion on the code and >>> its fit in Commons is always welcome, but please do not reply to >>> this thread with discussion, other than embedded justification for >>> negative VOTES. Use the thread from [1] instead. >>> >>> Git commands to grab the code: >>> >>> git clone g...@github.com:NormanShapiro/Naomi.git >>> git checkout gh-pages >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Phil >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/imoi5aipf63f7rsa >>> >>> [ ] +1 Yes! >>> [ ] +0 OK... >>> [ ] -0 OK, but... >>> [ ] -1 We should not do this, because... >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
