On 30 November 2015 at 08:11, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Le 29/10/2015 17:08, Gary Gregory a écrit : >> I know we had talked about apis and versions but at this point it seems >> like any kind of release would be good. I am ok with major version changes >> to break BC. > > What about using the scheme I suggested for commons-math recently? We > can release commons-imaging 1.0-beta1 with a dedicated GAV and package > name (for example org.apache.commons:commons-imaging-beta1 and > org.apache.commons.imaging.beta1.*). > > If there is a consensus on this I can volunteer to manage the release.
+1 Good idea here since we need feedback on the code to complete the API design. This would even play well with RERO as the GAV/package(s) can readily be abandoned. > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org