On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/2/16 11:44 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > > On 02/01/2016 06:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names > >> for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to > >> respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two > >> tallies will be presented: one among those who have volunteered for > >> the new PMC and a second among all respondents. Hopefully, one name > >> will emerge as consensus winner. If not, I will kick off another > >> runoff poll among the top choices. Please respond with your top > >> choice for the name. > >> > >> AjaMa > >> Epsilon > >> Erdos > >> Euclid > >> Euler > >> Gauss > >> JAML > >> Math > >> MathBlocks > >> MathComponents (or Math Components) > >> Mathelactica > >> MathModules > >> Megginson > >> modMath > >> Nash > >> Newton > >> Pythagoras > > I am split between Epsilon and Math, both seem quite appealing to me. > > Both choices are fine for me. > > I need a first choice for the tally. Can I assume that is "Epsilon?" > I would vote for Math as first choice. Thomas
