On Jun 24, 2016 12:13 PM, "Benedikt Ritter" <brit...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > we should stick to having one mailing list. If a component becomes so > specialized that the PMC fails to follow what is going on (like what > happend with CM), it is time to move that component out of commons. Having > separat mailing lists will only make things worse, IMHO.
+1 Gary > > Benedikt > > Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> schrieb am Fr., 24. Juni 2016 > um 16:58 Uhr: > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com > > > wrote: > > > > > Well, it sort of works for the incubator. They are constantly having > > discussions about how to do it better. And yes, it could work for us if all > > the subprojects have to follow the incubator rules, such as filling > > quarterly reports with the Commons PMC to be included in the board report, > > insuring that each sub-project has a strong enough community to keep moving > > forward (which implies shepherds/mentors to monitor those communities), > > etc. Do you really want to go that far? > > > > Not necessarily. My intention is to demonstrate, that some kind of > > compromise *is possible*, and might even be beneficial for us all. > > > > > > Jochen > > > > -- > > The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" > > > > > > http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > >
