Hi, IMHO, it would be simpler to add JDKSecureRandom and JDKThreadLocalRandom classes, so that you know what you have in a single glance. WDYT?
Regards, Julien Aymé 2016-08-08 13:47 GMT+04:00 Artem Barger <ar...@bargr.net>: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > >> A new git repository has been populated with the relevant >> codes, unit tests and documentation extracted from Commons >> Math ("o.a.c.math4.rng" package). >> > > I was looking on implementation of JDKRandom and it turns to use Random > implementation > from java.utils and actually delegates methods calls to it. Now I was > expect one to be able to > choose between Random, SecureRandom and ThreadLocalRandom and not solely > relying on > Random only implementation. > > Does it make a sense to introduce a construct which will allow to override > the default of Random > instance w/ other possible JDK implementations? > > > Best regards, > Artem Barger. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org