Hi,
IMHO, it would be simpler to add JDKSecureRandom and
JDKThreadLocalRandom classes, so that you know what you have in a
single glance.
WDYT?
Regards,
Julien Aymé
2016-08-08 13:47 GMT+04:00 Artem Barger <ar...@bargr.net>:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>
>> A new git repository has been populated with the relevant
>> codes, unit tests and documentation extracted from Commons
>> Math ("o.a.c.math4.rng" package).
>>
>
> I was looking on implementation of JDKRandom and it turns to use Random
> implementation
> from java.utils and actually delegates methods calls to it. Now I was
> expect one to be able to
> choose between Random, SecureRandom and ThreadLocalRandom and not solely
> relying on
> Random only implementation.
>
> Does it make a sense to introduce a construct which will allow to override
> the default of Random
> instance w/ other possible JDK implementations?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Artem Barger.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
