On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Julien Aymé <julien.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> IMHO, it would be simpler to add JDKSecureRandom and
> JDKThreadLocalRandom classes, so that you know what you have in a
> single glance.
> WDYT?
>
IMO make sense, since it will allow to preserve inheritance relationships
similar
to those of JDK w/ Random, SecureRandom and ThreadLocalRandom classes.
Of course it's interesting to hear Gilles opinion since he is an author of
the changes.
Best regards,
Artem Barger.
