Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. The site build
failed for me with Java 1.8 because of Javadoc errors, but was
successful with Java 1.7 - not blocking.

Artifacts and site look good. Some minor nits for the site:
- In the changes report I am incorrectly listed as developer for
BEANUTILS-465 and BEANUTILS-470. Probably a Copy&Paste error.
- There is a bunch of checkstyle warnings which seem to be caused by a
mis-configured license check.

In total: +1, good work!
Oliver

Am 21.09.2016 um 18:54 schrieb Stian Soiland-Reyes:
> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 (from RC3)
> 
> This should fix earlier Java 6 / Maven 3.0 build issues with RC2 and
> adds a BUILDING.txt
> 
> (Tested with Centos 6, Oracle JDK 6 and Maven 3.0.4)
> 
> 
> SVN tag (rev 1761786):
>  
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/beanutils/tags/BEANUTILS_1_9_3_RC3/
> 
> Site:
>   https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc3/
> 
> Javadoc:
>   https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc3/apidocs/index.html
> 
> API changes since 1.9.2 (japicmp):
>   
> https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc3/japicmp-maven-plugin-report.html
> 
>   (Note: "Semantic Versioning: 0.0.1" indicates the API differences
> are compatible with a patch revision)
> 
> RAT report:
>   https://stain.github.io/commons-beanutils/1.9.3-rc3/rat-report.html
> 
> 
> Distribution files (rev 15476)
>   
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/BEANUTILS_1_9_3_RC3/
> 
> 
> Distribution files hashes (SHA1):
> 
> 4c285c2c9af35be0ea77e6ada9674e2c7b226fa6  commons-beanutils-1.9.3-bin.tar.gz
> b2e6f70aaa2ca500899cb149c919b6bbb0256f96  commons-beanutils-1.9.3-bin.zip
> d9f237583ab7b8b4a4bdf55694e915b5af9e165a  commons-beanutils-1.9.3-src.tar.gz
> cc16e32ec4acdf8a78c3cae0c7b85cec3a773190  commons-beanutils-1.9.3-src.zip
> 
> 
> KEYS file to check signatures:
>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> 
> Maven artifacts:
>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1202/
> 
> 
> 
> [ ] +1 Release it.
> [ ] +0 Go ahead; I don't care.
> [ ] -0 There are a few minor glitches: ...
> [ ] -1 No, do not release it because ...
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours, let's say 2016-09-25T08:00:00Z
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to