+1 > On Jan 11, 2017, at 8:39 AM, Eric Barnhill <ericbarnh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Brent Worden <brent.wor...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Are the originally mentioned transforms in or out of scope of >> commons-numbers? >> >> Brent >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> >> wrote: >> >>> See discussion thread, copied below. >>> >>> [ ] Yes >>> [ ] Yes but I prefer this name: ... >>> [ ] No, because ... >>> >>> I'll assume that this is a lazy consensus vote, to be closed in 72 hours >>> from now (i.e. on January 12, at 18:00:00 UTC). >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Gilles >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 15:57:51 +0000, sebb wrote: >>> >>>> On 9 January 2017 at 11:46, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:08:18 +0100, Eric Barnhill wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It is overall a fine plan by me. A precision class makes more sense >> than >>>>>> duplicating equals methods. >>>>>> >>>>>> From a practical standpoint I think it would be better to see >> Quaternion >>>>>> in >>>>>> its own subpackage than with Complex. Simply because I don't use them >>>>>> and >>>>>> packages are better maintained by those who use them. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is hard to see how the transforms fit in. If anything they belong >>>>>> with >>>>>> the new sigproc libraries. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Fine. >>>>> >>>>> Is there any objection on the name "Commons Numbers"? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Since the namespace belongs to the whole of Commons, this question >>>> should be posed to all of Commons, i.e. using the [ALL] prefix. >>>> >>>> Are there better matches for the intended scope? [Or do we want that >>>>> the scope grows to also contain the "o.a.c.math4.prime" package" and >>>>> possibly more of number-theoretic functionality (as was proposed some >>>>> time ago to be added to Commons Math)?] >>>>> >>>>> Shall I wait a couple of days before filing the request with INFRA? >>>>> [I.e. to change the "git" repository, JIRA project and github mirror.] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Gilles >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Eric >>>>>> On 8 Jan 2017 10:17, "Gilles" <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How about renaming the component to "Commons Numbers" (or another >> name >>>>>>> if preferred) that would contain the following modules: >>>>>>> * commons-numbers-core (with classes such as "Precision"). >>>>>>> * commons-numbers-complex >>>>>>> * commons-numbers-quaternion >>>>>>> * commons-numbers-fraction >>>>>>> * commons-numbers-continued-fraction >>>>>>> * commons-numbers-fft (Fast Fourier Transform) >>>>>>> * commons-numbers-fct (Fast Cosine Transform) >>>>>>> * ... >>>>>>> ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gilles >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
