Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out with the transition. On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> The following people > Eric Barnhill > Rob Tompkins > Jörg Schaible > Emmanuel Bourg > voted +1 > > Vote passes. > > Gilles > > > On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 19:02:04 +0100, Gilles wrote: > >> See discussion thread, copied below. >> >> [ ] Yes >> [ ] Yes but I prefer this name: ... >> [ ] No, because ... >> >> I'll assume that this is a lazy consensus vote, to be closed in 72 hours >> from now (i.e. on January 12, at 18:00:00 UTC). >> >> Thanks, >> Gilles >> >> >> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 15:57:51 +0000, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 9 January 2017 at 11:46, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:08:18 +0100, Eric Barnhill wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> It is overall a fine plan by me. A precision class makes more sense >>>>> than >>>>> duplicating equals methods. >>>>> >>>>> From a practical standpoint I think it would be better to see >>>>> Quaternion >>>>> in >>>>> its own subpackage than with Complex. Simply because I don't use them >>>>> and >>>>> packages are better maintained by those who use them. >>>>> >>>>> It is hard to see how the transforms fit in. If anything they belong >>>>> with >>>>> the new sigproc libraries. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Fine. >>>> >>>> Is there any objection on the name "Commons Numbers"? >>>> >>> >>> Since the namespace belongs to the whole of Commons, this question >>> should be posed to all of Commons, i.e. using the [ALL] prefix. >>> >>> Are there better matches for the intended scope? [Or do we want that >>>> the scope grows to also contain the "o.a.c.math4.prime" package" and >>>> possibly more of number-theoretic functionality (as was proposed some >>>> time ago to be added to Commons Math)?] >>>> >>>> Shall I wait a couple of days before filing the request with INFRA? >>>> [I.e. to change the "git" repository, JIRA project and github mirror.] >>>> >>>> >>>> Gilles >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Eric >>>>> On 8 Jan 2017 10:17, "Gilles" <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi. >>>>>> >>>>>> How about renaming the component to "Commons Numbers" (or another name >>>>>> if preferred) that would contain the following modules: >>>>>> * commons-numbers-core (with classes such as "Precision"). >>>>>> * commons-numbers-complex >>>>>> * commons-numbers-quaternion >>>>>> * commons-numbers-fraction >>>>>> * commons-numbers-continued-fraction >>>>>> * commons-numbers-fft (Fast Fourier Transform) >>>>>> * commons-numbers-fct (Fast Cosine Transform) >>>>>> * ... >>>>>> ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Gilles >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
