I have a similar method in our code -- the use case is to take user input 
(plain English field names, for instance) and turn it into variable names for 
DTOs (or similar).

Another use we have for it is taking Java format ENUM_NAMES and turning them 
into camelCaseVariableNames for things like dynamic property sheets.

~Roger Whitcomb

-----Original Message-----
From: Duncan Jones [mailto:dun...@wortharead.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 7:32 AM
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [lang] Appetite for new method StringUtils.toCamelCase(String str, 
char delimiter, boolean capitalizeFirstLetter)

On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 at 15:27, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> IMO camel casing is all about words so [text] WordUtils. But why not 
> have a CamelCaseUtils instead?
>
> Gary


+1. IMO it belongs in TEXT (if anywhere) and we should avoid classes 
+with
static methods.

Per our other conservation about case conversions, we should carefully specify 
whether this uses upper- or title-case and how it behaves in different locales.

OOI, what is your real world use case for this?

Duncan


>
> On Jun 1, 2017 7:14 AM, "Rob Tompkins" <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > > On Jun 1, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Isn't this kind of stuff or anything camel case supposed to be in
> [text]
> >
> > I’m ok with that path as well. It feels like it’s on the line 
> > between the two components. Either way, it sounds like you’re not 
> > opposed to adding
> it
> > to a component.
> >
> > Should it be TextUtils.toCamelCase(String str, char delimiter, 
> > boolean capitalizeFirstLetter), or WordUtils maybe, if we were to 
> > put it in
> [text]?
> >
> > -Rob
> >
> > > these days?
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > On Jun 1, 2017 7:03 AM, "Rob Tompkins" <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello all,
> > >>
> > >> Folks at my day job have a method that takes in a space delimited
> String
> > >> (or arbitrarily delimited string for that matter), and returns a 
> > >> camel cased string. Is there any reason that this shouldn’t be in
> > StringUtils? It
> > >> feels reasonable to me. What are folks thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> -Rob
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> ---- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to