Yes, that's mentioned in my previous mail, I was also curious to know from the C developers here in dev-list that how can we make *that* C code better? basically I'm looking findbug, checkstyle, jococo, junit *equivalent* for C code.
Regards, Amey On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 7:44 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also note that there is hardly any Java code; most of it is written in C. > > On 14 July 2017 at 00:43, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It seems OK to me to update to Java 6 for now and get this to compile > under > > java 9 for those folks who will try... > > > > Gary > > > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Thanks for great insights Mark. > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017, 9:28 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> > On 12 July 2017 16:33:01 CEST, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >Are there plans to require 1.7 for Tomcat anytime? Otherwise, it > might > >> > >be > >> > >necessary to make a new major version of daemon eventually for Java 8 > >> > >or 9. > >> > > >> > Tomcat major versions are aligned with Java EE versions which in turn > >> have > >> > a minimum Java version. > >> > > >> > Tomcat supports 3 current versions in parallel so we currently have: > >> > > >> > Tomcat 9 - Java EE 8 - Java 8 > >> > Tomcat 8 - Java EE 7 - Java 7 > >> > Tomcat 7 - Java EE 6 - Java 6 > >> > > >> > Tomcat 7 support will continue until at least Java EE 9 is released. > That > >> > is meant to be next year but there are no firm dates yet and > experience > >> > suggests the Java EE 9 release date will slip. > >> > > >> > On that basis I expect Tomcat to need a Daemon that supports Java 6 > for > >> at > >> > least 2 more years. > >> > > >> > Is there a user requirement driving an increase in the minimum Java > >> > version? If not, I suggest we stick with 6 for now. > >> > > >> > >> There is no user requirement , Commons daemon is still keeping minimum > >> dependency on java 1.5, we were thinking to move on minimum 1.6, nice to > >> hear there won't be any issue with tomcat since it's already on 1.6 > >> > >> For moving to much higher i.e. java 1.7 I'm sure daemon will take > another > >> 2-3 year for keeping stability across projects. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Amey > >> > >> Mark > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > >Anyways, 1.6 minimum makes sense to me mainly due to Java 9's > compiler > >> > >not > >> > >supporting Java 5 targets anymore. > >> > > > >> > >On 12 July 2017 at 09:19, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> On 11 July 2017 21:02:54 CEST, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> > >> > >wrote: > >> > >> >Hi Daemon Maintainers / All, > >> > >> > > >> > >> >Daemon seems to be still being maintained on svn, do we have any > >> > >plan > >> > >> >moving code base to git ? > >> > >> > >> > >> No preference on this. > >> > >> > >> > >> >As fact there is low activity in daemon no one thought of bumping > >> > >> >version > >> > >> >from 1.5 to 1.6 OR we are keeping it purposefully to 1.5 ? > >> > >> >shall we bump it minimum to 1.6 ? > >> > >> > >> > >> 1.6 is OK for Tomcat. Anything higher will cause problems. > >> > >> > >> > >> Mark > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
