On 15 July 2017 at 15:21, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, that's mentioned  in my previous mail, I was also curious to know from
> the C developers here in dev-list that how can we make *that* C code
> better? basically I'm looking findbug, checkstyle, jococo, junit
>  *equivalent* for C code.

No idea on automated tools.
However when I last looked there was plenty of scope for better documentation.

Also I did wonder if the Prunmgr GUI might be better coded as a
(mainly) Java application.

The procrun stuff has to remain as C.

> Regards,
> Amey
>
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 7:44 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Also note that there is hardly any Java code; most of it is written in C.
>>
>> On 14 July 2017 at 00:43, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > It seems OK to me to update to Java 6 for now and get this to compile
>> under
>> > java 9 for those folks who will try...
>> >
>> > Gary
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thanks for great insights Mark.
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017, 9:28 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On 12 July 2017 16:33:01 CEST, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >Are there plans to require 1.7 for Tomcat anytime? Otherwise, it
>> might
>> >> > >be
>> >> > >necessary to make a new major version of daemon eventually for Java 8
>> >> > >or 9.
>> >> >
>> >> > Tomcat major versions are aligned with Java EE versions which in turn
>> >> have
>> >> > a minimum Java version.
>> >> >
>> >> > Tomcat supports 3 current versions in parallel so we currently have:
>> >> >
>> >> > Tomcat 9 - Java EE 8 - Java 8
>> >> > Tomcat 8 - Java EE 7 - Java 7
>> >> > Tomcat 7 - Java EE 6 - Java 6
>> >> >
>> >> > Tomcat 7 support will continue until at least Java EE 9 is released.
>> That
>> >> > is meant to be next year but there are no firm dates yet and
>> experience
>> >> > suggests the Java EE 9 release date will slip.
>> >> >
>> >> > On that basis I expect Tomcat to need a Daemon that supports Java 6
>> for
>> >> at
>> >> > least 2 more years.
>> >> >
>> >> > Is there a user requirement driving an increase in the minimum Java
>> >> > version? If not, I suggest we stick with 6 for now.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> There is no user requirement , Commons daemon is still keeping minimum
>> >> dependency on java 1.5, we were thinking to move on minimum 1.6, nice to
>> >> hear there won't be any issue with tomcat since it's already on 1.6
>> >>
>> >> For moving to much higher i.e. java 1.7 I'm sure daemon will take
>> another
>> >> 2-3 year for keeping stability across projects.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Amey
>> >>
>> >> Mark
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >Anyways, 1.6 minimum makes sense to me mainly due to Java 9's
>> compiler
>> >> > >not
>> >> > >supporting Java 5 targets anymore.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >On 12 July 2017 at 09:19, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> On 11 July 2017 21:02:54 CEST, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com>
>> >> > >wrote:
>> >> > >> >Hi Daemon Maintainers / All,
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >Daemon seems to be still being maintained on svn, do we have any
>> >> > >plan
>> >> > >> >moving code base to git ?
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> No preference on this.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >As fact there is low activity in daemon no one thought of bumping
>> >> > >> >version
>> >> > >> >from 1.5 to 1.6 OR we are keeping it purposefully to 1.5 ?
>> >> > >> >shall we bump it minimum to 1.6 ?
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> 1.6 is OK for Tomcat. Anything higher will cause problems.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Mark
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>> >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to