I am assuming that JUnit 5 will be backward compatible with JUnit 4, I might be wrong. I'd like to focus on a single dependency for now (JUnit) and not do a multi-module project. If someone want to do the same for TestNG, then have at it. KISS and small for 1.0.
Gary On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita < brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote: > +1 for the idea and for looking at JUnit 5.x and maybe AssertJ. > CheersBruno > > From: Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > Sent: Saturday, 4 November 2017 1:44 PM > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit > > I certainly like the idea, especially if the docs are good about pulling in > other related dependencies to complement the whole thing. General resource > management rules would be great, though, like the ones we have in Log4j. > > Also, I haven't looked closely at it yet, but supporting JUnit 5.x as well > would be nice. > > On 3 November 2017 at 18:11, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I'd propose we start a new component called "Apache Commons JUnit". > > > > The goal would be to gather useful and reusable code like JUnit rules. > > > > This component would be focused on JUnit 4.x only. > > > > For example: org.apache.commons.collections4.junit. > > SetDefaultLocaleTestRule > > > > I have other rules stashed here and there as well, for example a Set > > Default Charset Rule. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Gary > > > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > >
