+1 for a name like Commons Testing On 4 November 2017 at 11:58, Bernd Eckenfels <e...@zusammenkunft.net> wrote:
> I like the idea (and prefer Commons Testing), for example a method to list > all non-daemon threads after a test run (to see there is no resource leak) > can be used independent of the Unit Test Framework. > > Gruss > Bernd > -- > http://bernd.eckenfels.net > ________________________________ > From: Hasan Diwan <hasan.di...@gmail.com> > Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 5:42:39 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit > > How about "Apache Commons Testing"? -- H > > On 4 November 2017 at 09:10, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Pascal Schumacher < > > pascalschumac...@gmx.net> > > wrote: > > > > > JUnit 5 is not backwards compatible (Package/Annotation-Names have > > > changed, Rules were replaced by a new extension model), but it can run > > > JUnit 3 and JUnit 4 Tests if you add an additional dependency. See > > > http://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#migrating-from-junit4 > > > for details. > > > > > > OK, so "Apache Commons Extras for Junit 4" > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 04.11.2017 um 15:53 schrieb Gary Gregory: > > > > > >> I am assuming that JUnit 5 will be backward compatible with JUnit 4, I > > >> might be wrong. I'd like to focus on a single dependency for now > (JUnit) > > >> and not do a multi-module project. If someone want to do the same for > > >> TestNG, then have at it. KISS and small for 1.0. > > >> > > >> Gary > > >> > > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita < > > >> brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote: > > >> > > >> +1 for the idea and for looking at JUnit 5.x and maybe AssertJ. > > >>> CheersBruno > > >>> > > >>> From: Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > >>> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > > >>> Sent: Saturday, 4 November 2017 1:44 PM > > >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit > > >>> > > >>> I certainly like the idea, especially if the docs are good about > > pulling > > >>> in > > >>> other related dependencies to complement the whole thing. General > > >>> resource > > >>> management rules would be great, though, like the ones we have in > > Log4j. > > >>> > > >>> Also, I haven't looked closely at it yet, but supporting JUnit 5.x as > > >>> well > > >>> would be nice. > > >>> > > >>> On 3 November 2017 at 18:11, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi All, > > >>>> > > >>>> I'd propose we start a new component called "Apache Commons JUnit". > > >>>> > > >>>> The goal would be to gather useful and reusable code like JUnit > rules. > > >>>> > > >>>> This component would be focused on JUnit 4.x only. > > >>>> > > >>>> For example: org.apache.commons.collections4.junit. > > >>>> SetDefaultLocaleTestRule > > >>>> > > >>>> I have other rules stashed here and there as well, for example a Set > > >>>> Default Charset Rule. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thoughts? > > >>>> > > >>>> Gary > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > OpenPGP: > https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xFEBAD7FFD041BBA1 > If you wish to request my time, please do so using > http://bit.ly/hd1ScheduleRequest. > Si vous voudrais faire connnaisance, allez a > http://bit.ly/hd1ScheduleRequest. > > <https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xFEBAD7FFD041BBA1 > >Sent > from my mobile device > Envoye de mon portable > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
