It sounds like we all like the idea of this new component. I'll create the git repo tonight or by tomorrow morning at the latest.
Gary On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > This daemon thing is interesting, I something similar to dump each N > seconds threads to investigate some tests locking on a CI. Can goes > there as well probably. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn > > > 2017-11-05 16:23 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory <[email protected]>: > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> So are you advocating for a multi-module project? > >> > >> - commons-testing > >> - commons-testing-junit4 > >> - commons-testing-junit5 > >> > >> ? > >> > >> Gary > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Bernd Eckenfels < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I like the idea (and prefer Commons Testing), for example a method to > >>> list all non-daemon threads after a test run (to see there is no > resource > >>> leak) can be used independent of the Unit Test Framework. > >>> > >> > > Do you have such a gadget? > > > > Gary > > > > > >> > >>> Gruss > >>> Bernd > >>> -- > >>> http://bernd.eckenfels.net > >>> ________________________________ > >>> From: Hasan Diwan <[email protected]> > >>> Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 5:42:39 PM > >>> To: Commons Developers List > >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit > >>> > >>> How about "Apache Commons Testing"? -- H > >>> > >>> On 4 November 2017 at 09:10, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Pascal Schumacher < > >>> > [email protected]> > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > JUnit 5 is not backwards compatible (Package/Annotation-Names have > >>> > > changed, Rules were replaced by a new extension model), but it can > run > >>> > > JUnit 3 and JUnit 4 Tests if you add an additional dependency. See > >>> > > http://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#migrating-f > >>> rom-junit4 > >>> > > for details. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > OK, so "Apache Commons Extras for Junit 4" > >>> > > >>> > Gary > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > Am 04.11.2017 um 15:53 schrieb Gary Gregory: > >>> > > > >>> > >> I am assuming that JUnit 5 will be backward compatible with JUnit > 4, > >>> I > >>> > >> might be wrong. I'd like to focus on a single dependency for now > >>> (JUnit) > >>> > >> and not do a multi-module project. If someone want to do the same > for > >>> > >> TestNG, then have at it. KISS and small for 1.0. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Gary > >>> > >> > >>> > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita < > >>> > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >> > >>> > >> +1 for the idea and for looking at JUnit 5.x and maybe AssertJ. > >>> > >>> CheersBruno > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> From: Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> To: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> Sent: Saturday, 4 November 2017 1:44 PM > >>> > >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I certainly like the idea, especially if the docs are good about > >>> > pulling > >>> > >>> in > >>> > >>> other related dependencies to complement the whole thing. General > >>> > >>> resource > >>> > >>> management rules would be great, though, like the ones we have in > >>> > Log4j. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Also, I haven't looked closely at it yet, but supporting JUnit > 5.x > >>> as > >>> > >>> well > >>> > >>> would be nice. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 3 November 2017 at 18:11, Gary Gregory < > [email protected]> > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> I'd propose we start a new component called "Apache Commons > JUnit". > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> The goal would be to gather useful and reusable code like JUnit > >>> rules. > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> This component would be focused on JUnit 4.x only. > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> For example: org.apache.commons.collections4.junit. > >>> > >>>> SetDefaultLocaleTestRule > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> I have other rules stashed here and there as well, for example a > >>> Set > >>> > >>>> Default Charset Rule. > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> Thoughts? > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> Gary > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> OpenPGP: > >>> https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xFEBAD7FFD041BBA1 > >>> If you wish to request my time, please do so using > >>> http://bit.ly/hd1ScheduleRequest. > >>> Si vous voudrais faire connnaisance, allez a > >>> http://bit.ly/hd1ScheduleRequest. > >>> > >>> <https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search= > 0xFEBAD7FFD041BBA1 > >>> >Sent > >>> from my mobile device > >>> Envoye de mon portable > >>> > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
