> On Jan 4, 2018, at 9:32 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:21:52 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>> On Jan 4, 2018, at 9:18 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 08:56:09 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>>>> On Jan 4, 2018, at 8:41 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 08:08:05 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jan 4, 2018, at 5:24 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 21:07:41 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, now I have a plugin that detaches the distributions, zips the
>>>>>>>> site, and then commits the zipped site, RELEASE-NOTES.txt (from the
>>>>>>>> root), and the distributions to the svn staging area. All from:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mvn clean site deploy -Prelease -Duser.name=chtompki
>>>>>>>> -Duser.password=<my_password>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thoughts on pulling this in as a new component and starting to get it
>>>>>>>> to a more formal state? I’m sure we could add more, but this does take
>>>>>>>> away a considerable portion of the manual steps.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does it work for modular components? [See below.]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, as I said before I’ve not written any maven unit/integration
>>>>>>>> tests. I do know that I could contrive some unit tests using
>>>>>>>> PowerMockito (but that feels mildly pointless because it is indeed a
>>>>>>>> contrivance with little value). So, I will try to investigate the
>>>>>>>> maven testing mechanics, but what I currently have does indeed work.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Should I call a vote for the new component?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> -Rob
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jan 3, 2018, at 8:59 PM, chtom...@apache.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Author: chtompki
>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu Jan 4 01:59:44 2018
>>>>>>>>> New Revision: 24003
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>>>>> Removing commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Removed:
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/binaries/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/binaries/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz.asc
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/binaries/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz.md5
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/binaries/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz.sha1
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/binaries/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/binaries/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip.asc
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/binaries/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip.md5
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/binaries/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip.sha1
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/site.zip
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/source/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/source/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz.asc
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/source/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz.md5
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/source/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz.sha1
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/source/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-src.zip
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/source/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-src.zip.asc
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/source/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-src.zip.md5
>>>>>>>>> dev/commons/text/source/commons-text-1.3-SNAPSHOT-src.zip.sha1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the case of a modular component, the file
>>>>>>> commons-<name>-<version>-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>> should contain the JAR files (codes, sources, javadoc) of all
>>>>>>> the modules, and the file
>>>>>>> commons-<name>-<version>-src.tar.gz
>>>>>>> should contain the (main) source codes of all the modules.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If your new plugin does that, then it will be unnecessary to
>>>>>>> add an ad-hoc module like "dist-archive" (see e.g. [1]) that
>>>>>>> only exists for the sake of creating those ("include-all")
>>>>>>> "src" and "bin" files.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes. Your have a good point point Gilles.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would seem that we would want some flavour of a new distribution
>>>>>> handling mojo for just this case, but I don’t foresee that as being
>>>>>> overly difficult, we’d have to just accommodate for a slightly more
>>>>>> manual process. I still think that with a little work we could make
>>>>>> the signing of those artifacts as well as the upload to svn maven
>>>>>> target based as opposed to you having to copy files around on your
>>>>>> machine and check them in manually.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why "more manual process"? Is the modular case any different from the
>>>>> maven API POV (I'd imagine it's "just" building recursively)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you plan to add the necessary code as part of your current work on
>>>>> this new plugin? This will surely help for the release of at least
>>>>> RNG
>>>>> Numbers
>>>>> Statistics
>>>>> Math
>>>>> and any other currently (or future) modular component.
>>>>
>>>> I can make it work. It just wasn’t entirely clear to me what command
>>>> you run to build the dists. And, it looks as if you are building dists
>>>> (that aren’t published) for every module in the build.
>>>
>>> [Talking about RNG.]
>>> All modules are published/deployed to Nexus, except "dist-archive"
>>> that only exists to bundle the contents of all the other modules
>>> (separate "bin" and "src", as per Apache requirement).
>>> For that purpose, I had to create a custom POM (in "dist-archive")
>>> to run the "assembly" plugin.
>>
>> Ok yeah, that’s what I was thinking, and I would (after writing the
>> code to do this) have you add another target after “assembly:single”
>> that would sign and check in the dists to svn. Does that sound
>> appropriate?
>
> That would already be an improvement; but I had hoped for complete
> automation: maven "knows" about the modules (they are declared in
> the POMs); hence it seems natural that the "deploy" target should
> be able to collect all the appropriate stuff out of the module
> directories and make the bundle (as it does for each individual
> module: signing and uploading to Nexus, without manual intervention
> and no need to specify assembly directives (in "src/assembly").
Yes, that would indeed be a better end-goal. Would take more work from me to
get there. My goal at this point is to get some quick improvement out the door
and then RERO it to better. But I’ll have to write some tests for better
confidence.
>
> Best,
> Gilles
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> What is the release process here, and I’ll write something to get it
>>>> to properly work.
>>>
>>> AFAICT, the release process is standard.[1]
>>> Everything works smoothly except for making the Apache distribution
>>> (when the project is modular).
>>> See issue:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-31
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Gilles
>>>
>>> [1] See e.g.
>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-rng.git;a=blob;f=doc/release/release.howto.txt;h=d1d96ed6baa522cb0abedd57e6022a819a5a6a01;hb=HEAD
>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Rob
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Gilles
>>>>>
>>>>>> -Rob
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Gilles
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-31
>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-31>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
