On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 09:24, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 10:02, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > I checked a few other ASF lists and they all have Reply-To set either
> > to the current list or to dev@ for lists such as commits@ and
> > notifications@
>
> I had a look at that too.
> But IMO
>  * "dev" and
>  * "commits", "notifications", ...
> are different cases in that the former relays messages that originated
> from real people while the latter comes from a "bot" and it would make
> no sense to reply to it.

Yes. That's deliberate, for the reason you state.
The point is that all the lists have Reply-To set.

> Gilles
>
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 08:47, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > -1
> > >
> > > Changing the reply-to configuration increases the chances of message
> > > threads being moved off-list by accident. I am concerned about the risk
> > > of harm to the community that that represents.
> > >
> > > I vote to leave the current list configuration as it. I do not see any
> > > of the issues described. (I'm using Thunderbird.)
> > >
> > > On 11/02/2019 08:24, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > The mailing list dev@commons.apache.org appears to always and forcibly
> > > > set the header Reply-To: Commons Developers List
> > > > <dev@commons.apache.org>. I had asked INFRA to remove this remove the
> > > > reply-to munging. They asked for documented consensus before making
> > > > this change.
> > > >
> > > > This is broken for multiple reasons.
> > > >
> > > > It violates RFC 2822 which requires that reply-to MUST only be used
> > > > for when " ... the author of the message suggests that replies be
> > > > sent."
> > > >
> > > > While this should be enough, it is useful to explain some of the
> > > > reasoning the standard is the way it is:
> > > >
> > > > - It breaks MUAs that have "reply to all" and "reply" (and maybe even
> > > > "reply to list"). In doing so, having this setting greatly increases
> > > > the chance of privacy violations by people that expect the mailing
> > > > lists to act normally. If you're trying to send a private reply using
> > > > the normal method to reply, the message will be made public.
> > >
> > > I don't see this.
> > >
> > > Reply - > original poster
> > > Reply List -> list
> > > Reply All -> List and OP
> > >
> > > > - It adds nothing: by means of copy and paste a private reply is still
> > > > possible, just annoying, and a workaround for a broken mailing list
> > >
> > > No need for this workaround in Thunderbird.
> > >
> > > > - Some mail readers provide 'personal mail' indicators. This only
> > > > triggered when you are on the CC or TO lines. The 'feature' breaks
> > > > this.
> > > > - Some people prefer mail CCed to them as well as the mailing list,
> > > > especially if reading a mailing list is lower priority than personal
> > > > mail.
> > >
> > > Both the above require that replies are sent to both the list and the
> > > OP. While some people might prefer this, others do not. And we have no
> > > way of telling which list subscribers fall into which camp.
> > >
> > > Mail clients usually have other ways to mark threads that are of interest 
> > > .
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > >
> > > > As such I'd like to vote that we fix the dev@ mailing list
> > > >
> > > > +1 = the mailing list misconfiguration will be removed
> > > > -1 = the mailing list will continue to remain broken
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Eitan Adler
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to