I am not sure what to say.. I completely agree that most distributions have
undefined statistical values. I dont really have any particular reason for
adding mode in the interface like one mentioned by Sir Alex for mean and
variance. Please let me know if I should go ahead..

On Fri, 10 May 2019, 2:15 am Alex Herbert, <alex.d.herb...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On 9 May 2019, at 21:17, Eric Barnhill <ericbarnh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Awesome!
> >
> > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:44 AM Udit Arora <udit18...@iiitd.ac.in>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I will see what I can do. It will take some time, but I will get to know
> >> more about the other distributions.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 9 May 2019, 10:58 pm Eric Barnhill, <ericbarnh...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Udit, is it clear what to do here? Gilles recommends you propose some
> >> edits
> >>> to ContinuousDistribution instead, to return Mode and Median.
> >>>
> >>> But then, if an interface is altered, all the classes that implement
> that
> >>> interface need to have these functions added, so we hope you are up for
> >> all
> >>> that additional work. We can help you.
>
> I think it would be prudent to go through all the distributions and see
> what is defined for each. Wikipedia has a helper table for all its
> distributions containing:
>
> Mean
> Median
> Mode
> Variance
> Skewness
> Ex. kurtosis
> Entropy
> Fisher Information
>
> If many are undefined then you are adding to an interface something not
> generally supported.
>
> Currently the ContinuousDistribution interface only has the mean and the
> variance. But note that these are used by the inverse cumulative
> probability method in the base abstract class. Same goes for the
> DiscreteDistribution.
>
> I am +0 for adding more methods. I don’t see a reason not to. But nor do I
> see a need (within the library) to have them at the interface level if the
> mode or median for example are not required in a generic way.
>
> >>>
> >>> Last is the idea of accessor methods. if the method starts with get_()
> >> then
> >>> in principle this is just returning a field already present. But with
> >> that
> >>> in mind, I don't know why we already have a method name like getMean()
> in
> >>> this interface. We don't really know whether for a given distribution,
> >> that
> >>> would be a true accessor or need to be calculated. So I think all these
> >>> method names should just be mean(), mode(), median(), etc.
> >>>
> >>> So sorry if this is blowing up into more work than you expected. It
> often
> >>> works that way! I certainly think these changes are worthwhile however.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 7:17 AM Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Udit.
> >>>>
> >>>> Le jeu. 9 mai 2019 à 12:52, Udit Arora <udit18...@iiitd.ac.in> a
> >> écrit :
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I intend to add a mode function for the Cauchy Distribution. It is a
> >>>> small
> >>>>> addition which i thought might be helpful.
> >>>>
> >>>> How will it be helpful?  I.e. what would an application developer
> >>>> be able to do, that he can't with the current code?
> >>>>
> >>>> You've surely noted that that the class you want to modify is but
> >>>> one of the implementations of the interface "ContinuousDistribution".
> >>>> So if you propose to change the API, the change should be done
> >>>> at the interface level, and the appropriate computation performed, or
> >>>> method overloads defined, for all implementations.
> >>>>
> >>>> The "accessor" methods refer to fields that were set by the
> contructor;
> >>>> e.g. for "CauchyDistribution", "median" and "scale".
> >>>> In this case, it happens that "mode" has the same value as "median",
> >>>> but does this warrant an additional method?
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Gilles
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to