Hello. Le jeu. 6 juin 2019 à 18:14, Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org> a écrit : > > I've raised a GitHub PR [1] to add the Java 9 module name to [math] on > the MATH_3_X branch. Assuming that is merged, I'm willing to raise > another PR with the necessary bits to prepare the repo to release > v3.6.2. > > This approach sidesteps all issues with commons-4 and does the minimum > necessary for downstream users to use the project as a module in Java > 9 onwards. (At my day job we produce open source that depends on > commons-math, which means I can't add a module-info.java until > commons-math has a module name.) > > While I'm technically still a commons committer, I think it would be > highly innappropriate for me to try and shepherd the actual v3.6.2 > release. Is anyone willing to work with me to do the release? A v3.6.2 > release would contain just the module name change and one performance > improvement that was added to the repo in 2016, so it should be a case > of cranking the handle providing not too much has changed in the > process since 2016.
I was about to merge the PR but, on my machine, the build fails. Did you try? Back then (pre-fork), I was in favour of maintaining both lines (3.X and 4.X); but the 3.X branch has not been maintained for more than 3 years, and it shows. Now (post-fork), my opinion is that the effort would be better placed in getting the new dependencies of the development version of Commons Math released, and release CM 4.0 thereafter. Regards, Gilles > thanks > Stephen > [1] https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/107 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
