> I am not sure if this one class is worth the work and management overhead for a new jar. me neither:-)
Bernd Eckenfels <e...@zusammenkunft.net> 于2020年5月27日周三 下午6:19写道： > The only clean place I could see would be a new module of VFS so it does > not introduce a new dependency to commons-mail, I am not sure if this one > class is worth the work and management overhead for a new jar. > > As sample code we could put it in the Maven site or maybe as a test > dependency? > > Gruss > Bernd > > > -- > http://bernd.eckenfels.net > ________________________________ > Von: Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 12:16:22 PM > An: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > Betreff: Re: [email and vfs] about adding class FileObjectDataSource > > Yeh that is the function I used. > I want to put the class FileObjectDataSource I made to some repo, because I > think it is somehow useful, and everybody who use > commons-vfs&&commons-email will benefit from it. > but I just don't know where should I put it to. > > > Siegfried Goeschl <siegfried.goes...@gmail.com> 于2020年5月27日周三 下午6:11写道： > > > Hi, > > > > I do not fully understand the problem - AFAIK there is an attach method > > which takes a DataSource sou can just pass your FileObjectDataSource? > > > > But I guess I miss something here :-) > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Siegfried Goeschl > > > > > > > On 27.05.2020, at 11:30, Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi. > > > I'm trying to maintain commons-email today, and I want to make a new > > class > > > FileObjectDataSource, who implements javax.activation.DataSource. > > > But things is not as easy as I want. > > > 1. the reason. > > > the reason for making such a class is when last month I was doing some > > > school work for graduation project, and in that system I need a backend > > > server to send emails. > > > And I want to attach some FileObject (from vfs) as attachments of the > > > emails sent, so I have to make a class FileObjectDataSource (something > > > which is actually very similar to javax.activation.FileDataSource but > > > dealing not File but FileObject). > > > then I thought this class might be helpful to others, so I want to put > it > > > into some place. > > > the question is, where shall I put it? commons-email, or commons-vfs? > > > 2. commons-email. > > > start with commons-email. > > > If I make such a class into commons-email, then commons-email must add > > > commons-vfs as a dependency. > > > which sounds crazy to implement so small a feature to include a large > new > > > dependency. > > > 3. commons-vfs > > > If I make such a class into commons-vfs, then some worse things might > > > happen. > > > First, the javax.activation.DataSource is actually deleted since jdk11, > > and > > > commons-email use [jakarta.mail] for Infrastructure, whitch contains a > > copy > > > of javax.activation.DataSource. > > > So commons-vfs must make [jakarta.mail] as a dependency. > > > which sounds crazy to implement so small a feature to include a large > new > > > dependency. > > > Second, [jakarta.mail] is actually 2.0rc now, and they claimed they > > would > > > release 2.0 soon. > > > and in jakarta2.0, all uses of javax.activation.DataSource will be > > > replaced by jakarta.activation.DataSource. > > > Also, it is not actually related to vfs itself, but only a usage of > vfs, > > so > > > I don't think it good to be added to vfs. > > > 4. so maybe I should make another repo for storing such a class? > > > man, starting a repo for a single class sounds crazy. > > > 5. any better ideas? > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > >
