Hi. 2020-06-07 8:21 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com>: > If you are telling about 144: > yes, original codes runs like: > f[0] = f0; > f[1] = f1; > f[2] = f[2-2] = f[0] = f[0] > f[3] = f[3-2] = f[1] = f[1] > f[4] = f[4-2] = f[2] = f[0] > f[5] = f[5-2] = f[3] = f[1] > > the new codes runs like: > f[0] = f0; > f[1] = f1; > f[2] = 2&1==0 ? f0 : f1 = f0 > f[3] = 3&1==0 ? f0 : f1 = f1 > f[4] = 4&1==0 ? f0 : f1 = f0 > f[5] = 5&1==0 ? f0 : f1 = f1 > > thus it runs faster for around 7% faster on my performance tests. >
Wrong thread. Please reply on JIRA, where this discussion should be taking place.[1] Regards, Gilles [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1538 > > > Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> 于2020年6月7日周日 上午5:53写道： > >> Hi. >> >> 2020-06-06 14:21 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com>: >> > Alright, done. >> > This pr is now splitted into two prs. >> > https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/144 >> > https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/143 >> >> I think that there are issues with some of the changes (e.g. where >> the previous code used an "index" variable but in the new version >> there is a hard-coded number). >> >> Gilles >> >> > [...] >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
