I’ll be nice an summarize. Giles started two vote threads. The first was polluted with discussion and eventually closed. The second has not passed and is effectively dead but Giles hasn’t closed the vote.
So nothing has been approved. Ralph > On May 14, 2021, at 5:48 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Are seriously asking someone else to read through 40 emails and summarize > for you? Perhaps part of your contribution might be to do this yourself? > > Gary > > On Fri, May 14, 2021, 08:15 Avijit Basak <avijit.ba...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All >> >> This has been a long mail thread. It will be really helpful if >> anyone can summarize the decisions. >> Is the proposal of developing the new machine learning component >> approved? >> If the team repository is not provided is there any way to go >> ahead? >> Waiting for a response. >> >> Thanks & Regards >> --Avijit Basak >> >> On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 02:26, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 21:13, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> It is true that there much less friction these days to get a repository >>>> going with GitHub, GitLab, and BitBucket, but, for now, the Commons >>> Sandbox >>>> is still available. If we want to do away with the sandbox, then let's >>>> talk about that separately. >>>> >>> >>> There is no need for a Sandbox component to use SVN, and it's easy to >>> create a new Commons git repo. >>> >>> A non-ASF code repo would require code to be checked for license >>> compliance etc before it could become a Commons component. >>> A Sandbox component does not require that. >>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 6, 2021, 11:26 Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On May 6, 2021, at 8:06 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> What about the Commons Sandox? Would that be a good place to start? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Emmanuel just sort of proposed doing away with it. As he put it, >> anyone >>>>> can create a >>>>> GitHub repo so why does it need to be under the apache user. He >> hasn’t >>>>> formally >>>>> made a proposal for that and I’m not sure how I would vote on it if >> he >>>>> did. He does >>>>> have a point. At the same time I’m not sure I’d close off doing >>>>> experimental or >>>>> early development within the ASF space. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Avijit Basak >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
