Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 02:24, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> a écrit : > > Le 2021-05-05 20:31, Oliver Heger a écrit : > > > What about the sandbox? IIUC, every committer can start a new > > component there. If then a community forms around this component, it > > can move to proper (which would then require a vote). > > With the various source hosting solutions available today we no longer > need the sandbox, and I think we should discontinue this practice. The > machine learning library could as well start its life on GitHub, it > doesn't need Apache Commons.
It is not nice to decide for others what they may need. It would have been courteous to acknowledge the answers to your argument against having a dedicated component (to more efficiently manage codes that have already been accepted within the "Commons" project, as part of CM), and explain * why those answers would not make you withdraw your -1, * why the ASF would be better off without the offered contribution, * why some initiatives in Commons deserve a worse treatment than others. My rationale, for whether a specific component is needed, has always been the same: Define a scope (and stick to it). You seem to find this acceptable for any Commons project except those which you tagged as "math-related". So I'm asking: Will it make any difference if the "machine learning" codes are further developed within [Math]? Concretely: * Would you vote to release CM v4.0? * Would you help (more than if the ML codes were in a specific component) to review/merge the PRs? Gilles > > Emmanuel Bourg > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
