Grammar: umping from 1.2.x to 1.3.0 seems appropriate *since* we updated from Java 6 to 7.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 8:34 AM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bumping from 1.2.x to 1.3.0 seems appropriate when we updated from Java 6 > to 7. > > Gary > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 7:42 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 27/01/2022 22:29, Mark Thomas wrote: >> > Please review the release candidate and vote. >> > This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now. >> > >> > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts >> > [ ] +0 OK, but... >> > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... >> > [X] -1 I oppose this release because... >> >> The minimum Java version has been changed since 1.2.4 from Java 6 to >> Java 7. This isn't mentioned in the release notes (which explicitly >> state Java 6 as the minimum) or the change log. I think we need at least >> an RC2 to address these. >> >> On the same topic, should we increase the version number to 1.3.0? >> >> On one hand, no-one should even be using Java 6 (or Java 7 but Tomcat 8 >> has a mandatory spec requirement to run on Java 7) these days so from >> that point of view 1.2.5 doesn't seem unreasonable. On the other, >> changing the minimum Java version in a point release doesn't seem right. >> I'm leaning towards 1.3.0 but would be happy with 1.2.5 if that is the >> consensus. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Mark >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >>
