+1

It would be great to get this code out to developers.

Regards,
Matt J

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:46 AM Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Le lun. 25 juil. 2022 à 16:38, Alex Herbert <alex.d.herb...@gmail.com> a 
> écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 14:37, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > How about making a "beta" release of the next major version:
> > >     4.0-beta1
> > > ?
> > >
> > > This
> > >    https://commons.apache.org/
> > > page refers to a "1.0-beta1" release [Statistics] that does not
> > > seem to exist.  This is a required dependency for [Math].
> > >
> >
> > I have been held up with other things so have not made progress on the
> > releases: Numbers -> RNG -> Statistics
> >
> > Statistics requires:
> >
> > - a new version of numbers to obtain the updated more accurate Brent solver
> > for the inverse CDF computation, plus all the work on the beta and gamma
> > functions. - a new version of RNG that has updated distribution samplers
> >
> > I think numbers could be released now.
> >
> > Ideally I would like to add a SplittableUniformRandomProvider interface to
> > RNG before it is released with the new XBG generators. These are splittable
> > in the JDK and it makes sense to do this now as RNG now supports Java 8 and
> > this functionality applies to Splittable streams. This is not essential and
> > it could be released as it is. However the splittable functionality may be
> > limited if added later with constraints of binary compatibility. I would
> > rather try to put it in now. I have done a lot of thinking on adding to the
> > API so I could try and put this up on a Jira ticket for discussion.
>
> IMHO, we should expose the current, several years old, state of [Math] so
> that users may become aware of what they miss out (in [RNG], [Numbers]
> and [Geometry]) by still using version 3.6.1.
> A release makes it easier for application developers to test (and perhaps
> provide feedback and contribute here).  A "beta" release will allow us to fix
> things without BC constraints.
> We could also make a "beta" release of [RNG] (1.5-beta1), on which
> [Statistics] (1.0-beta1) and [Math] (4.0-beta1) would depend, with the
> same advantage.
>
> Best,
> Gilles
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to