I'm OK with moving this experiment along here. Gary
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023, 10:31 AM Rob Tompkins <[email protected]> wrote: > If that’s indeed the case, then wouldn’t the easiest thing be to simply > incorporate the feather into the current logo design as a quick update > while we wait for the new branding? > > -Rob > > > On Dec 26, 2023, at 10:32 AM, Gilles Sadowski <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Le mar. 26 déc. 2023 à 16:12, Rob Tompkins <[email protected]> a écrit > : > >> > >> Good call. I’m going to add one to the list and then put the logos up > for a [VOTE] to the community to choose which (by ordering them most > preferred to least). > > > > Well, a good logo is not just a question of preference; e.g. there may be > > some design guidelines which not everyone is aware of, or pay attention > > to, or otherwise finds appealing. > > > > More importantly the ASF board has decided (AFAIK) to again change > > the "graphical identity" of the foundation; so this probably not the > right > > time for reviving such discussion. > > > > Regards, > > Gilles > > > >> [...] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
