Hi Andrew.
> Is this the wrong place for such a question?
It is the right place.
> how I should find an answer
For your own usage you can just add such dependency.
For a long-time solution, this usually takes months(sometime even years)
for community to decide how to do. Of course this sounds quite slow but
this is just how open source works...

Andrew Coates <big.andy.coa...@gmail.com> 于2024年2月28日周三 21:19写道:

> Hi all,
>
> Is this the wrong place for such a question? If so, would someone be so
> kind as to let me know how I should find an answer / raise this, please?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 12:01 PM Andrew Coates <big.andy.coa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm seeing a runtime failure using TarArchiveOutputStream when updating
> to
> > commons-compress 1.26.0.
> >
> > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/codec/Charsets
> >         at org.apache.commons.compress@1.26.0
> >
> /org.apache.commons.compress.archivers.tar.TarArchiveOutputStream.<init>(TarArchiveOutputStream.java:212)
> >         at org.apache.commons.compress@1.26.0
> >
> /org.apache.commons.compress.archivers.tar.TarArchiveOutputStream.<init>(TarArchiveOutputStream.java:157)
> >         at org.apache.commons.compress@1.26.0
> >
> /org.apache.commons.compress.archivers.tar.TarArchiveOutputStream.<init>(TarArchiveOutputStream.java:147)
> >         at testcontainers@1.19.5
> >
> /org.testcontainers.containers.ContainerState.copyFileToContainer(ContainerState.java:350)
> >         ...
> >
> > Commons-compress 1.26.0 contains changes to make use of commons-codec,
> > rather than its own copy of files, but I see that the POM marks
> > commons-codec as *optional*. Excuse my potential ignorance, but I thought
> > optional dependencies shouldn't cause runtime failures if not present.
> Is
> > this not the case?
> >
> > Obviously, I can just add commons-codec as an explicit dependency. But
> > this seems wrong IMHO.
> >
> > Should I sign up for an account and raise this as a bug in Jira?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andy
> >
>

Reply via email to