From my perspective, we all need to move on to newer versions of Java, and while it’s a pain, it’s also key to gaining new capabilities.
> On May 23, 2024, at 3:42 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > User experience is subjective... ;-) > > What happens when Java 11 is EOL? The frames will be gone for good anyway. > > Gary > > On Thu, May 23, 2024, 3:41 PM Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > >> So there is nothing I can do to convince you to install OpenJDK 11 to >> improve the user experience? Having multiple JDKs installed isn't >> uncommon though. >> >> Emmanuel Bourg >> >> >> Le 23/05/2024 à 20:47, Gary Gregory a écrit : >>> ATM, I am using Java 17 for everything, at work, at FOSS. >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> On Thu, May 23, 2024, 2:28 PM Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> What about building with JDK 11 and the -frame option then? That's the >>>> best of both worlds. >>>> >>>> Emmanuel Bourg >>>> >>>> Le 23/05/2024 à 18:44, Gary Gregory a écrit : >>>>> I disagree, I think the search box is a great feature. >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 23, 2024, 11:26 AM Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> -0 >>>>>> >>>>>> The javadoc was built with Java 17 and is less usable than the javadoc >>>>>> generated by Java 8. I recommend building the next release with Java 8 >>>>>> instead. >>>>>> >>>>>> Emmanuel Bourg >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> _______________________ Eric Pugh | Founder | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such.
