On Wed, Dec 24, 2025, 15:35 Phil Steitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Do we have 3 Commons (or ASF willing to become Commons) committers willing > to actively work on this? I can help. Gary That has traditionally been the criteria applied > to consider new Commons components. Usually, we have also started them in > the Sandbox. I can see the value of this code for legacy things, but I > wonder if we'll have enough actual committer energy to develop and maintain > it. vot > No vote is required to create a sandbox component. That might be a way to > start trying to build a community around this idea. > > Phil > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 1:40 AM Elric V <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2025-12-18 14:35, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > > Commons JAXP > > > > +1. > > > > Every time I do a security audit for a new client, I have to teach them > > about this over and over again. It would be great if I could just get > > them to use some Commons magic that sorts this out for good. > > > > Can probably contribute to some tests and maybe some documentation > > depending on how/when things move along. > > > > - Elric > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
