Well, I guess here we are bound to whatever Commons PMC decides to this
respect.
The introduction of gitpubsub is definitely great news, since many
projects are currently using svn just for their sites.
But I think (I hope) a pure Maven site would be supported in the new
infrastructure, so we could keep what we already have.
Those are my two cents.
On 29/03/15 03:02, John D. Ament wrote:
So anyone have any questions/comments about the infra discussions around
retiring CMS?
I'm also curious, what format for the site were you planning to use?
Storing asciidoc/markdown in git and publishing via maven site?
John
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:58 AM Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
And then:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/CMS+
Decommissioning+RFC+-+Frequently+Asked+Questions
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 660 2747 925
e: [email protected]
w: http://redlink.co