Hello, 2015-03-29 19:32 GMT+02:00 Sergio Fernández <[email protected]>:
> Well, I guess here we are bound to whatever Commons PMC decides to this > respect. > > The introduction of gitpubsub is definitely great news, since many > projects are currently using svn just for their sites. > > But I think (I hope) a pure Maven site would be supported in the new > infrastructure, so we could keep what we already have. > We have some documentation about site publication on our website [1]. For simple components you only have to call mvn site-deploy and it will do the trick. I've heard from people that multi-module projects are some how more tricky to setup with commons parent pom, but I'll have to look into that tomorrow (I haven't worked on any of our multi-module projects so far). Benedikt [1] http://commons.apache.org/site-publish.html > > Those are my two cents. > > > > On 29/03/15 03:02, John D. Ament wrote: > >> So anyone have any questions/comments about the infra discussions around >> retiring CMS? >> >> I'm also curious, what format for the site were you planning to use? >> Storing asciidoc/markdown in git and publishing via maven site? >> >> John >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:58 AM Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> And then: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/CMS+ >>> Decommissioning+RFC+-+Frequently+Asked+Questions >>> >>> >> > -- > Sergio Fernández > Partner Technology Manager > Redlink GmbH > m: +43 660 2747 925 > e: [email protected] > w: http://redlink.co > -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter http://github.com/britter
