[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15543907#comment-15543907
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on COMMONSRDF-35:
------------------------------------------

Github user ansell commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-commonsrdf/pull/24#discussion_r81666096
  
    --- Diff: 
rdf4j/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rdf/rdf4j/impl/IRIImpl.java ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
    +/**
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.commons.rdf.rdf4j.impl;
    +
    +import org.apache.commons.rdf.rdf4j.RDF4JIRI;
    +
    +public final class IRIImpl extends 
AbstractRDFTerm<org.eclipse.rdf4j.model.IRI> 
    +   implements RDF4JIRI {
    +
    +   public IRIImpl(org.eclipse.rdf4j.model.IRI iri) {
    +           super(iri);                     
    +   }
    +   @Override
    +   public boolean equals(Object obj) {
    +           if (obj == this) { return true; }
    +           if (obj instanceof IRIImpl) {
    +                   IRIImpl impl = (IRIImpl) obj; 
    +                   return asValue().equals(impl.asValue());
    +           }
    +           if (obj instanceof org.apache.commons.rdf.api.IRI) {
    +                   org.apache.commons.rdf.api.IRI iri = 
(org.apache.commons.rdf.api.IRI) obj;
    +                   return value.toString().equals(iri.getIRIString());
    +           }
    +           return false;
    +   }
    +
    +   @Override
    +   public String getIRIString() {
    +           return value.toString();
    +   }
    +
    +   public int hashCode() {
    +           // Same definition
    +           return value.hashCode();
    +   }
    +
    +   @Override
    +   public String ntriplesString() {
    +           return "<" + value.toString() +  ">";
    --- End diff --
    
    RDFWriter implementations should always check IRI's for which characters 
they need to escape, however, this area is likely to have a lot of bugs, as it 
is principally fuzz tested given the scope (Unicode) cannot be thoroughly unit 
tested. the IRI.toString method isn't likely to be used directly, and in 
general RDF4J is fairly relaxed about what it supports (via RDFParserConfig 
settings) because some users prefer to be able to transport with irregular data 
rather than fail early.
    
    My presumption here was that ntriplesString was designed to be more strict 
about what it emitted compared to the Object.toString override because it 
followed the rules of a particular concrete format, RDF-1.1 N-Triples.


> rdf4j integration
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: COMMONSRDF-35
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-35
>             Project: Apache Commons RDF
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Stian Soiland-Reyes
>            Assignee: Stian Soiland-Reyes
>              Labels: integration, rdf4j, sesame
>             Fix For: 0.3.0
>
>
> Add a new rdf4j module with implementation for Eclipse rdf4j
> See https://github.com/apache/incubator-commonsrdf/tree/rdf4j/rdf4j
> A legacy sesame branch could then be added by mainly copy/paste and change 
> the import



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to