[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15615746#comment-15615746
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on COMMONSRDF-47:
-----------------------------------------------------------

Commit ee725a5aaf5d94c9ab5ff7f355bb5d0cb370bfa7 in incubator-commonsrdf's 
branch refs/heads/COMMONSRDF-47 from [~stain]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-commonsrdf.git;h=ee725a5 ]

COMMONSRDF-47 RDFSyntax as an interface

OfficialRDFSyntax is the enum - which implements the interface

basically .mediaType -> .mediaType() etc


> RDFSyntax should be interface, not enum
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COMMONSRDF-47
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-47
>             Project: Apache Commons RDF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: api
>    Affects Versions: 0.2.0
>            Reporter: Stian Soiland-Reyes
>            Assignee: Stian Soiland-Reyes
>             Fix For: 0.3.0
>
>
> [~p_ansell] raises in [pull request 
> 25|https://github.com/apache/incubator-commonsrdf/pull/25#discussion_r85231845]
> {quote}
> Using enum for RDFSyntax is a bad idea unless it overrides an interface and 
> the interface is used in method signatures instead of the enum. There are 
> many other RDFSyntaxes, and enum (without implementing an interface) is only 
> suited to cases where the full set are known a priori.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to