On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote:
> 2015-01-15 9:19 GMT+01:00 <no-re...@projects.apache.org>:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > The following new base data was set for bloodhound by rjollos:
> >
> > {
> > "category": "content",
> > "GitRepository": "",
> > "bug-database": "http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/";,
> > "description": "Apache Bloodhound is an open source collaboration
> tool
> > to track the progress of and help distribute tasks within a project.
> With a
> > particular focus on software development, it includes integration with
> > popular source control software including Apache Subversion, Git and
> > Mercurial.",
> > "mailing-list": "
> > https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/wiki/BloodhoundContactInfo";,
> > "programming-language": "Python",
> > "file": "bloodhound",
> > "pmc": "bloodhound",
> > "shortdesc": "Apache Bloodhound is a software development
> > collaboration tool, including issue tracking, wiki and repository
> browsing",
> > "download-page": "http://bloodhound.apache.org/";,
> > "homepage": "http://bloodhound.apache.org/";,
> > "SVNRepository": "http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bloodhound/trunk";,
> >
>
> Shouldn't this be http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bloodhound/ ?
>
> Benedikt
>
I think you are probably right about that, thanks for noticing.
One other thing, the "category" was "build-management". That didn't seem
quite right to me, but given the presence of subversion in that category
maybe it should be interpreted more broadly to include
"configuration-management" tools. Bloodhound is a project management tool
with an issue tracker as a primary component. We are very similar to Apache
Allura, which is in the "content" category. I assumed Allura was better
categorized when making the change.
- Ryan
