Gotcha. Let me read it :)

> On Mar 12, 2015, at 6:55 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) 
> <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> Discussion on ComDev has cleared up the confusion. Jim, you and I are on 
> point. There's a mail in your inbox and we will report through ComDev.
> 
> Ross
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 3:50 PM
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Cc: Apache Board
> Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
> 
> Yes, Roberto offered to have SF host an Apache Neighborhood (??) for us, to 
> replace Apache-Extras. I put he and David in touch, since David was best to 
> know what exactly we needed and what the division of labor should be.
> 
> If David lacks the time to follow-up, I very much volunteer to take this up 
> again.
> 
>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 4:35 PM, Ulrich Stärk <u...@spielviel.de> wrote:
>> 
>> We reported about apache extras in September and November and both 
>> times we were told that Jim, Ross, David and Roberto were working on 
>> it. Some time in October David asked for feedback on a proof of concept, no 
>> news since then.
>> 
>> Can you shed some light on who is driving this atm?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Uli
>> 
>> On 2015-03-12 21:22, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
>>> Today Google announced that Google Code will be shutting down Jan 25, 2016.
>>> 
>>> We need to create a replacement for Apache-extras. Can we please make 
>>> sure that progress on this is reported in the ComDev board report each 
>>> quarter.
>>> 
>>> I suggest the starting point should be to expand discussions with 
>>> SourceForge, they have offered neighborhoods in the past. David, with 
>>> his infra hat, has been exploring options for download provision already 
>>> (I'm not sure of the current status).
>>> 
>>> (and as a reminder, this is why we don't like to use services 
>>> provided by external companies)
>>> 
>>> Ross
>>> 
>>> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft 
>>> Corporation
>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to