Heh. When I put that sentence in the board report we didn't have projects-new yet.
I don't see a reason why we shouldn't open up those two (or even all of /comdev) for all committers as long as changes are first discussed on our lists. What do others think? Cheers, Uli On 2015-03-14 16:38, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Hi, > > I lately gave patches for projects-new that were not applied: it seems there > is a problem to determine who should do it (to avoid projects-new to be a > single-man affair). > > Then I made some investigations: in the last board report for ComDev [1], I > think I found the cause: > "Since artifacts produced by ComDev are usually documentation on our website > which is writable for all Apache committers, we usually do not add committers > to the ComDev project." > > Then should projects(-new).apache.org become writeable for all Apache > committers too? Same for reporter.apache.org? > > Regards, > > Hervé > > [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Community_Development.html >
