+1
On 03/19/2015 01:27 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
+1 to lazy consensus - this is a reversible step
-----Original Message-----
From: Ulrich Stärk [mailto:u...@spielviel.de]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 10:08 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: commit rights to ComDev non-community.a.o site resources
Actually I just realized how dumb that question is.
So: I assume lazy consensus and will go ahead and modify the permissions if
nobody objects within the next 72 hours.
Cheers,
Uli
On 2015-03-19 18:07, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
So shall we put this to a vote or may I assume lazy consensus?
If so I'd go ahead and modify the permissions accordingly.
Cheers,
Uli
On 2015-03-16 09:21, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
One doesn't exclude the other. I'd first like us to establish whether
committership to the ComDev code is by invitation only or open to all existing
Apache committers (which I'd prefer).
Cheers,
Uli
Am 15.03.2015 um 23:22 schrieb Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>:
Why not register the solution as a component of the COMDEV project
in JIRA, and do the same as any other ASF project does when it comes to code:
register and evaluate issues, have patches registered there and have
invited committers work from there.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Ulrich Stärk <u...@spielviel.de> wrote:
Heh.
When I put that sentence in the board report we didn't have
projects-new yet.
I don't see a reason why we shouldn't open up those two (or even
all of
/comdev) for all committers
as long as changes are first discussed on our lists.
What do others think?
Cheers,
Uli
On 2015-03-14 16:38, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Hi,
I lately gave patches for projects-new that were not applied: it
seems
there
is a problem to determine who should do it (to avoid projects-new
to be a single-man affair).
Then I made some investigations: in the last board report for
ComDev
[1], I
think I found the cause:
"Since artifacts produced by ComDev are usually documentation on
our
website
which is writable for all Apache committers, we usually do not add
committers
to the ComDev project."
Then should projects(-new).apache.org become writeable for all
Apache committers too? Same for reporter.apache.org?
Regards,
Hervé
[1]
https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Community_Development.html
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
