+1 (non-binding)

Regards,

Hervé

Le dimanche 15 mars 2015 22:24:34 Ulrich Stärk a écrit :
> Heh.
> 
> When I put that sentence in the board report we didn't have projects-new
> yet.
> 
> I don't see a reason why we shouldn't open up those two (or even all of
> /comdev) for all committers as long as changes are first discussed on our
> lists.
> 
> What do others think?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Uli
> 
> On 2015-03-14 16:38, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I lately gave patches for projects-new that were not applied: it seems
> > there is a problem to determine who should do it (to avoid projects-new
> > to be a single-man affair).
> > 
> > Then I made some investigations: in the last board report for ComDev [1],
> > I
> > think I found the cause:
> > "Since artifacts produced by ComDev are usually documentation on our
> > website which is writable for all Apache committers, we usually do not
> > add committers to the ComDev project."
> > 
> > Then should projects(-new).apache.org become writeable for all Apache
> > committers too? Same for reporter.apache.org?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Hervé
> > 
> > [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Community_Development.html

Reply via email to