On 21/03/2015 19:24, "Pierre Smits" <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>If in stead of the veto possibility the simple majority rule was at play, >it might have been so that fewer project would have reported consecutively >that no new people were onboarded A lack of new people on-boarded does not necessarily indicate a project in trouble (though it may do so). More often than not in my experience (at least outside of the Incubator which is a special case) it represents an established mature project with a low rate of turnover and attrition in the active community. If the PMC worries they are stagnating personnel wise they should report that in their board report or a PMC member could report privately to board@ if they think there is an issue that the PMC is not publicly acknowledging. On the other hand if the board thinks the projects lack of new committers/PMC members is an issue then they can and will follow up on that with the relevant PMC. Rob
