@jani, Actually, I don't feel that need as (at least) Tim and you do. But I am sure that, you and your peers can find perfect validating reasons for having this service around (or considering it a TLP) when discussing such and more amongst yourselves.
Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:10 PM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > On 6 July 2015 at 15:00, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Tim Williams <william...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > ...I'd say this is the wrong place to have this particular discussion. > > > The courteous thing to do is to have a project specific discussion on > > > the project's specific list.... > > > > Agreed, that's what I meant to say, comdev has no business discussing > > the validity of the labs project unless that discussion is started by > > the labs PMC. > > > +1 as both LABS and ComDEV PMC I totally agree. I gave the project name > because it > seemed correct to answer Sebb, not to start a discussion about LABS. > > Pierre@ feel welcome to take this discussion to our mailing list > l...@labs.apache.org over > there I will be more than happy to discuss whether or not LABS is a real > TLP. > > looking forward to the discussion. > rgds > jan i. > > > > -Bertrand > > >
