Or stopping it. Best regards,
Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: > @jani, > > Actually, I don't feel that need as (at least) Tim and you do. But I am > sure that, you and your peers can find perfect validating reasons for > having this service around (or considering it a TLP) when discussing such > and more amongst yourselves. > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:10 PM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 6 July 2015 at 15:00, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Tim Williams <william...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > ...I'd say this is the wrong place to have this particular discussion. >> > > The courteous thing to do is to have a project specific discussion on >> > > the project's specific list.... >> > >> > Agreed, that's what I meant to say, comdev has no business discussing >> > the validity of the labs project unless that discussion is started by >> > the labs PMC. >> > >> +1 as both LABS and ComDEV PMC I totally agree. I gave the project name >> because it >> seemed correct to answer Sebb, not to start a discussion about LABS. >> >> Pierre@ feel welcome to take this discussion to our mailing list >> l...@labs.apache.org over >> there I will be more than happy to discuss whether or not LABS is a real >> TLP. >> >> looking forward to the discussion. >> rgds >> jan i. >> >> >> > -Bertrand >> > >> > >
