Nice. I like proza as well. Before long we'll embark on the path, where we only see multi-interpretable quotes and we quibble over semantics.
Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > Hopefully you don't mind me helping with a colorful euphemisms here. > In the words of immortal Tao De Jing > > When government is lazy and informal > The people are kind and honest; > When government is efficient and severe > The people are discontented and deceitful. > > Cos > > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:11PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > Pierre, I could find any number of euphemisms to say the same thing, but > > I prefer to say what I mean and not beat about the bush. > > > > To give you an idea where my disgust comes from: Every project here that > > I know of that has bylaws about decision-making has some kind of > > fundamental problem and constant tensions in the community. Now some > > people may think that extra rules serve to keep problems in check, but > > IMO they just make things worse. > > > > -- Brane > > > > > > On 06.07.2015 23:40, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > That's called 'difference of opinions'. Nobody is entitled to like > others' > > > viewpoints. In fact, there are certain viewpoints that hardly can cause > > > anything but regurgitation in a sane human being. On the hand, no one > can > > > denied anyone a right to express their opinions. > > > > > > Cos > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 12:10PM, Pierre Smits wrote: > > >> Thank you, Branko. I feel (somewhat) sorry for you, when I read your > > >> statement of being disgusted by the viewpoint of others on the > matter. I > > >> hope you recover from it soon. > > >> > > >> Best regards, > > >> > > >> > > >> Pierre Smits > > >> > > >> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > > >> Services & Solutions for Cloud- > > >> Based Manufacturing, Professional > > >> Services and Retail & Trade > > >> http://www.orrtiz.com > > >> > > >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >> > > >>> On 04.07.2015 18:34, Pierre Smits wrote: > > >>>> Having done a cursory review of the incubator reports to the board > for > > >>>> this year (January till May/June 2015), I found that only the SAMOA > > >>>> podling reported working on a project set of bylaws, which without > > >>>> knowing details could encompass and/or incorporate the code of > conduct. > > >>> I find myself disgusted by this widespread assumption that each > project > > >>> needs its own bylaws. WTF for? Are not ASF policies and practices > enough > > >>> for everyone? What sort of bylaws could you possibly invent that are > > >>> both a useful extension of these policies and practices /and/ are not > > >>> applicable to other projects? > > >>> > > >>> Per-project bylaws are just a tool for fragmenting the ASF > community, in > > >>> other words, they're a bad idea; paper-shuffling at its most useless. > > >>> > > >>> -- Brane > > >>> > > >
