To be clear, we ask first, and ensure that we edit out info
that she doesn't want public.

> On Dec 5, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> 
> I would think so, yeah!
> 
>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 10:34 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Now I finally understand what people are talking about.
>> 
>> Awesome! Jim, is this something we could publish? I assume it's easy to ask 
>> for permission, and maybe send Brenda a T-shirt (I am in a T-shirt phase 
>> today :) ).
>> 
>> Hadrian
>> 
>> On 12/04/2015 10:29 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>>> The PDF is filed at <http://s.apache.org/0Yi>.
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
>>>> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 04:45
>>>> To: dev@community.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Thanks for AOO
>>>> 
>>>> Attachment must have gotten stripped off
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 7:34 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Original mail was sent to Comdev; no attachment.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Followup with attachment was sent to private@openoffice.a.o
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 4 December 2015 at 12:21, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hmmm... not sure. It shows up in my copy.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:42 AM, Ross Gardler
>>>> <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Did an attachment get stripped?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:56 AM
>>>>>>> To: ComDev <dev@community.apache.org>
>>>>>>> Subject: Thanks for AOO
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sometimes, a letter can make your day!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to