On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Joe Schaefer >> <joe_schae...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: >>> ...We have options for phasing out president@, from simply using one of >>> Ross's personal addresses, to creating a dedicated alias of the >>> ombuds(man)@ variety... > > This is a nice contained task which fixes a concrete issue, and an opportunity > to make some tangible progress. > >> If I wanted to report something confidential I think I'd like to know >> exactly who gets those messages. >> >> So the best might be to simply list the @apache.org IDs of people who >> volunteer to receive such messages and process them with the required care, >> so that people who want to report something can choose who to report to. >> People can then use http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html to find out what >> roles those people have at the ASF. > > We already have a set of volunteers who were willing to serve behind the ombud > alias. Hopefully we can confirm their willingness to add their names to a > public list. > > Here's a simple patch: > > https://paste.apache.org/3AuO > > Thoughts > > I don't think the ASF Code of Conduct page has any specific maintainer > attached to it beyond the Board itself. I figure that once we have consensus > on a patch and a volunteer list, I can run the change by board@apache for > completeness, then apply.
I'd be very interested in helping to review the patch. I also 110% agree with Marvin that once we reach consensus here it'll have to be explicitly brought to board's attention at one of the monthly meetings. Thanks, Roman.
