When talking about formalizing our D&I effort, there have been essentially three options under discussion:
* Make it a sub-committee of ComDev. * Make it a president's committee. * Make it it's own PMC. The current proposal is to make it a president's committee. I'm not sure what the advantages and disadvantages of each approach is. I'd appreciate your thoughts. What do the powers, freedoms, and responsibilities of a committee look in each of these alternatives? What are the advantages and disadvantages with respect to our goals with D&I? Thanks, Myrle (Jim, this is an area you should be able to help us shine a light on, given your extensive experience at the ASF. You are explicitly invited to participate.)
