I'm sorry to admit I don't have the skills to keep something like this running reliable at this scale.
Niels On Mon, 7 Nov 2022, 12:41 Peter kovacs, <peter.kov...@posteo.de> wrote: > Hi all > > @walter > I don't think your argument is a good one. > If the name is inappropriate then we should change the Domain and not try > to stay invisible. > However this should be a different discussion. > > @Niels > An own server means work. I think it is only feasible if we get a team > together that maintains the service. Would you volunteer in case one is > build? > > All the best > Peter > > > Am 6. November 2022 23:52:03 MEZ schrieb Walter Cameron < > walter.li...@waltercameron.com>: > >Hi Niels, > > > >I don’t think it’s appropriate to further expand the impact of our > >improperly > >owned domain. Why risk people on social media confusing us with an > >Apache organization? > > > >Gunalchéesh, > >Walter > > > >On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 12:20 PM Niels Basjes <ni...@basjes.nl> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Given the recent events around twitter I had this crazy idea: > >> What if the ASF would run their own Mastodon instance under the > apache.org > >> domain? > >> > >> Primarily this would make it possible for all projects to have a clean > >> account that can be used for project announcements (i.e. usable by PMCs > ?) > >> I expect this to also make it quite easy to archive all communication > via > >> this route. > >> Like: > >> > >> - @a...@apache.org > >> - @fl...@apache.org > >> > >> Second (I consider this to be optional) it would allow all > >> committers/pmcs/... to have a clean ASF relatable point of > communication. > >> In my case > >> > >> - @nielsbas...@apache.org > >> > >> I have NO idea how easy/hard/expensive such a thing is at the scale of > the > >> ASF. > >> I just wanted to drop the idea here so it can be discussed (and then > either > >> be accepted or rejected). > >> > >> Curious to hear your thoughts. > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards > >> Niels Basjes > >> >
