I would like to make a slightly different proposal. Name the branch, on which development happens "develop" and the one that contains the released versions "releases". With "main" you never really know what it's used for.
But I think I brought this up multiple times before, so if be +1 on a change. Chris Gesendet von Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ________________________________ From: Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2023 10:19:44 AM To: dev@community.apache.org <dev@community.apache.org> Subject: Re: Standardise on 'main' as the default branch? +1 for it. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 8:11 PM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All bar one of the 4 comdev Git repos use 'main' as the default branch. > > I think we should standardise on that going forward, and change the > default branch for comdev-site. > > Agreed? > > Sebb > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
