Hi, There are many projects, where “main” contains the latest released version and „develop“ is for development. Others use “main” for development and something else for releases.
That’s why I’m suggesting naming the threads according to what they are used for. “main” for a developer is probably the branch he does his most work on (aka “develop”). “main” for a user is probably the branch that he uses for using the framework (aka “release”). With “release” and “develop” I think it’s absolutely clear what is on which branch. That was why I suggested it. Chris Von: tison <wander4...@gmail.com> Datum: Sonntag, 2. April 2023 um 14:18 An: dev@community.apache.org <dev@community.apache.org> Betreff: Re: Standardise on 'main' as the default branch? > Name the branch, on which development happens "develop" and the one that contains the released versions "releases". With "main" you never really know what it's used for. To me, "main" is always "develop". Best, tison. sebb <seb...@gmail.com> 于2023年4月2日周日 19:34写道： > On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 09:39, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > wrote: > > > > I would like to make a slightly different proposal. > > Name the branch, on which development happens "develop" and the one that > contains the released versions "releases". With "main" you never really > know what it's used for. > > I agree that main is no less ambiguous than master, but the website > does not really have a development/release cycle, so I'm not sure > 'release' is appropriate here. > > Maybe the default branch should be something like 'production' or > 'live' for websites. > However that would mean changing the other repos to keep in step. > > > But I think I brought this up multiple times before, so if be +1 on a > change. > > Thanks! > > > Chris > > > > Gesendet von Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > > ________________________________ > > From: Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2023 10:19:44 AM > > To: dev@community.apache.org <dev@community.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: Standardise on 'main' as the default branch? > > > > +1 for it. > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 8:11 PM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > All bar one of the 4 comdev Git repos use 'main' as the default branch. > > > > > > I think we should standardise on that going forward, and change the > > > default branch for comdev-site. > > > > > > Agreed? > > > > > > Sebb > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > >
