On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 at 02:44, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 2, 2025, at 09:58, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 at 17:20, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Oct 2, 2025, at 11:36 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Also, I suppose a related question is, do you think anyone would have 
> >>>> any objection to their name being listed on such a document on an Apache 
> >>>> website? I cannot personally think why they would (and this is all 
> >>>> already-public data) but I suppose it is possible that someone might, 
> >>>> and I want to be sensitive to that.
> >>>
> >>> AIUI, just because a particular item of PII is published in one
> >>> location does not mean it can be published elsewhere.
> >>
> >> Yeah, that’s what I was a little concerned about. The legalities (and, 
> >> indeed, just individual preferences or sensitivities) around aggregating 
> >> metrics remains a bit fuzzy to me. Do you think that this is better kept 
> >> to myself, then?
> >>
> >>> Does the data have to be fully public?
> >>> Indeed would it mean anything to the general public?
> >>
> >>
> >> I think it’s most valuable to other contributors on the same project - who 
> >> are not necessarily committers or PMC members. What I’m specifically 
> >> trying to encourage with this data is for individuals on projects to 
> >> welcome and celebrate new community participants, and milestones of 
> >> existing participants, since that kind of recognition tends to lead to 
> >> higher retention rates, according to research that I’ve seen at several 
> >> recent conferences. And that is, after all, the mandate of this PMC.
> >>
> >> But I do want to do this in a way that is respectful to those same 
> >> contributors.
> >
> > I were a new joiner, and I did not want to appear in the listings, I'm
> > not sure I would be happy to have to ask for my data to be omitted.
>
> What we do know is that the contributors' github id and email address are 
> public, assuming they appear in communications to the project's public mail 
> lists. So I have no privacy concerns "publishing" these bits of PII after 
> they are already public.

I thought once, but AIUI now, publication in one arena does not give
carte blanche to publication anywhere else.

> In any event, at the time when they accept an invitation for committer, these 
> bits will necessarily become public via announcement that they have been 
> voted and accepted for committer.

There's also big a difference between being published as one name in
hundreds or thousands of others, and as one name in a handful.

> Craig
>
> >
> >> —
> >> Rich Bowen
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
>
> Craig L Russell
> [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to