What the fuk

On Sat, Oct 4, 2025, 11:05 AM sebb <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 at 02:44, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Oct 2, 2025, at 09:58, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 at 17:20, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Oct 2, 2025, at 11:36 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Also, I suppose a related question is, do you think anyone would
> have any objection to their name being listed on such a document on an
> Apache website? I cannot personally think why they would (and this is all
> already-public data) but I suppose it is possible that someone might, and I
> want to be sensitive to that.
> > >>>
> > >>> AIUI, just because a particular item of PII is published in one
> > >>> location does not mean it can be published elsewhere.
> > >>
> > >> Yeah, that’s what I was a little concerned about. The legalities
> (and, indeed, just individual preferences or sensitivities) around
> aggregating metrics remains a bit fuzzy to me. Do you think that this is
> better kept to myself, then?
> > >>
> > >>> Does the data have to be fully public?
> > >>> Indeed would it mean anything to the general public?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I think it’s most valuable to other contributors on the same project
> - who are not necessarily committers or PMC members. What I’m specifically
> trying to encourage with this data is for individuals on projects to
> welcome and celebrate new community participants, and milestones of
> existing participants, since that kind of recognition tends to lead to
> higher retention rates, according to research that I’ve seen at several
> recent conferences. And that is, after all, the mandate of this PMC.
> > >>
> > >> But I do want to do this in a way that is respectful to those same
> contributors.
> > >
> > > I were a new joiner, and I did not want to appear in the listings, I'm
> > > not sure I would be happy to have to ask for my data to be omitted.
> >
> > What we do know is that the contributors' github id and email address
> are public, assuming they appear in communications to the project's public
> mail lists. So I have no privacy concerns "publishing" these bits of PII
> after they are already public.
>
> I thought once, but AIUI now, publication in one arena does not give
> carte blanche to publication anywhere else.
>
> > In any event, at the time when they accept an invitation for committer,
> these bits will necessarily become public via announcement that they have
> been voted and accepted for committer.
>
> There's also big a difference between being published as one name in
> hundreds or thousands of others, and as one name in a handful.
>
> > Craig
> >
> > >
> > >> —
> > >> Rich Bowen
> > >> [email protected]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> >
> > Craig L Russell
> > [email protected]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to